I was trying to come up with a good argument that wouldn't piss people off for this but here we are.
Doesn't matter what side of the coin I come down on on this one I'm going to be pissing someone off.
Roe v.s. Wade.
Going to keep this as simple as possible because I woke up randomly and apparently won't be able to go bac to sleep until I get this thought bubble popped.
Abortions should be legal.
The law, really doesn't need changed on a national level.
And letting smaller areas make them more restrictive is a logical fallacy
Here's why.
If you prevent abortions then you are agreeing that the government should have a say over how your children should be raised.
The proponents that are against women's rights...
Let's be honest here, abortion is just the scary beat stick being used around many larger issues concerning women's rights as decision making, autonomous, individuals.
These proponents are also against teaching actual sex education in public schools.
These same proponents want to defund support programs that do and would go to individuals that would need help with many of the things that come with or around situations that warrant an abortion.
Public Mental Health
Public Education
Welfare programs for funding and things.
The logical fallacy is strait forward.
Either keep Roe V Wade as is or
agree that raising a child should be 100% state funded from childhood to adult hood.
Food, housing, medical needs, educational needs.
The whole enchilada.
If you are going to tell a potential mother weighing their health and survivability against a child's health and survivability that they have no right to make, arguably, one of the hardest and most traumatic decisions in their life...
By that logic...
You have zero financial responsibility over the child once they are born.
You also have zero decision making power on what should be done with or for that child until that child is an adult.
Logic is a cold and hard.
My personal thoughts are pretty strait forward on the matter.
I have never met, or heard of, a person that has had more than one abortion.
And arguably, if they were the type to do such a thing as a "form of birth control" as many argue abortion is being used.
They are already
Using birth control in detriment to their own body so that they can avoid being put in the position of abortion being an option in the first place.
Or are so dead set against having children have gotten a hysterotomy or a tubal ligation.
It is none of my business about what decisions an individual, male or female, makes concerning their own care. Especially if that decision is made where medical professionals agree to perform the procedure under medically safe circumstances.
Lastly, and I'm being blunt as hell here.
If your argument is a religious one, for any reason what so over, on this topic.
Get.
Just, got sit in your corner and hush up.
We live in the United States.
Where, at it's founding, there was supposed to be a firm separation between church and state.
This is a state level, or government level, decision.
Until churches and religious organizations start paying taxes on their proceeds.
Until religious contributions and donations are no longer tax exempt then religious bias and input should have zero bearing on how any law is passed, especially in concerns to in individuals rights.
Women are not property.
Abortions, not matter how you feel about them, are a medical a procedure made by and agreed to by consenting adults where the health, physical and mental, are weighed and taken into consideration long before the decision is ever made.
Or
If you want me to put it more simply.
You want to make abortions illegal and take that choice away from a woman?
Then give up your guns.
Right Now.
Because you are of a belief that no one should have the right to make a life or death choice without consent of the larger whole.
Sheesh, now there's a rallying cry for the cause.
I'll give up my uterus when you give up your guns.
>.<
I'm going back to bed, if I can at this point.
Being woke up by this non sense when it was fairly decided over forty years ago and the data shows that the abortion rate has gone down and survivability of mothers and children during birth has gone up.
We don't need to "Be fruitful and multiply anymore."
We're on the verge of being overpopulated, and already are in a lot of places.
I'd apologize for the bluntness, but yeesh.
No, I don't apologize for the bluntness.
I might give it prettier words if/when asked in a larger forum but the stance stays the same.
It is a medical decision made between a woman and their healthcare professionals.
Everybody else can bugger off.
Also, planned parenthood does what they can to avoid that nonsense from the start.
Hence the word PLANNED, to help and individual, or couple, make wise decisions concerning the raising of a family.
It's almost 99% the purpose of the organization.
Making sure that people are doing what's right for their already existing or potential children.
Am I the only person in the flibbin world that pays attention to mission statements and then follows up with a check up on that organizations efficacy to that mission statement!?!
Sure feels like it sometimes.
What was I supposed to be doing again!?
Oh, right, sleeping.
Because I'm still trying to find a peaceful solution for a centuries old conflict.
Common, Supreme Court, can we not relitigate whether or not a woman is property of their husband and/or patriarch of their family?
We outlawed slavery (or at least were supposed to have, still a lot of things to be settled on that one) over 150 years ago.
Never mind, guess I'm not sleeping...
Back to work.