After reading through this months Game Informer I find
myself...well...as irritated as ever. I
know I've gone on the rant about the lack of journalistic integrity in game
rags before, and especially this one, but I really feel I need to point this
months issue out.
It is the “Top 50 Games of 2012” issue. Now, I agree a lot of the games on this list are legitimately good games, but this list seems to represent the most PUBLICISED games of 2012. I mean seriously, nearly 500 games have come out and that doesn’t even include small indie titles that didn’t have the official console stamp on them. (Also, there are some games still set to release later this month). Are you telling me that out of these 500 games and between 20 different reviewers the “best” were Halo, Mass Effect, Assassin’s Creed III, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Black Ops 2…gah! And “Mists of Pandaria"!? Really? That’s the same game that has been out for 8 years but now has 50% more Kung Fu Panda …seriously people.
It is the “Top 50 Games of 2012” issue. Now, I agree a lot of the games on this list are legitimately good games, but this list seems to represent the most PUBLICISED games of 2012. I mean seriously, nearly 500 games have come out and that doesn’t even include small indie titles that didn’t have the official console stamp on them. (Also, there are some games still set to release later this month). Are you telling me that out of these 500 games and between 20 different reviewers the “best” were Halo, Mass Effect, Assassin’s Creed III, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Black Ops 2…gah! And “Mists of Pandaria"!? Really? That’s the same game that has been out for 8 years but now has 50% more Kung Fu Panda …seriously people.
Now, don’t get me wrong there are a couple of toss in art
games that feel more like a tack on than anything else. “Here’s the title, a
stamp sized picture of the box, and three sentences about it.” “But look over
there, a half page on Borderlands, and a full page on Mass Effect, then another
half page on it later in the same article:”…buh…
Then there are the editors, 20 of them, and there’s about as much diversity here as a Klan meeting. It’s all 30 something white guys…wait, there’s a token Asian man, this is the gaming world after all…and…oh hey, is that a girl?
So…the picture starts to make a little more sense. All of these games are aimed at the “Target Demo” a 30’s something, white, male…because that’s what the magazine is written by and pandered too. Are you telling me that out of the 500 games from this year the top 10 lists of ALL of these editors look almost identical save for some small variations and the people publishing this thing aren’t seeing a tinsy bit of stagnation and lack of differing opinions. This is a gamer rag after all, it’s supposed to be about opinion, and having different opinions.
Then there are the editors, 20 of them, and there’s about as much diversity here as a Klan meeting. It’s all 30 something white guys…wait, there’s a token Asian man, this is the gaming world after all…and…oh hey, is that a girl?
So…the picture starts to make a little more sense. All of these games are aimed at the “Target Demo” a 30’s something, white, male…because that’s what the magazine is written by and pandered too. Are you telling me that out of the 500 games from this year the top 10 lists of ALL of these editors look almost identical save for some small variations and the people publishing this thing aren’t seeing a tinsy bit of stagnation and lack of differing opinions. This is a gamer rag after all, it’s supposed to be about opinion, and having different opinions.
“Did you see this game dude?” “I know dude, it’s totally
awesome.” “Hey! Tits McGee, did you see this game it’s awesome isn’t it.” “Um yeah guys it’s awesome, should I put it
on my top ten list.” “Oh yeah tits, you
totally should, especially ‘cause they sent us all free posters and stuff.”
Maybe it’s not that bad, but the “content” of the magazine really doesn’t paint a much better picture.
I am shaking my head right now. Because the irony has not
flown over my head
Yes, I am a 30 ‘s something white male, I do play Assassin’s Creed and Halo. Would I call them the best games I’ve played this year? ….meh. But when I read a rag of any sort I want to read some news, something outside my sphere of experience. Not be brow beaten with the same games that advertising has been shoved down my throat since it was announced at E3 two years ago. Especially when these editors are supposed to be playing games for a living and be, oh I don’t know, journalists. That’s like a movie reviewer going and seeing ONLY movies that have television spots and then copy pasting the box summary. “I love this game because you can do *insert game gimmick here*” “I love this game because of it’s awesome shiny graphics.” I hate to break it to you, but a shiny turd is still a turd. And a mouth full of bland ass oatmeal is still bland ass oatmeal even when it has food dye in it.
Yes, I am a 30 ‘s something white male, I do play Assassin’s Creed and Halo. Would I call them the best games I’ve played this year? ….meh. But when I read a rag of any sort I want to read some news, something outside my sphere of experience. Not be brow beaten with the same games that advertising has been shoved down my throat since it was announced at E3 two years ago. Especially when these editors are supposed to be playing games for a living and be, oh I don’t know, journalists. That’s like a movie reviewer going and seeing ONLY movies that have television spots and then copy pasting the box summary. “I love this game because you can do *insert game gimmick here*” “I love this game because of it’s awesome shiny graphics.” I hate to break it to you, but a shiny turd is still a turd. And a mouth full of bland ass oatmeal is still bland ass oatmeal even when it has food dye in it.
Big budget, and big production value, and big advertising do
not necessarily make a “Best game”. Best new game I’ve played this year? Probably the Walking Dead, but then again I
like point and click adventure games and it’s been a LONG while since one has
been released that didn’t feature Elmo or come packaged with a toy. And yeah, this game gets drooled over it’s
fair share in the article as well but, then again, this same rag tore “Jurassic Park ” apart a couple years back for the
same reasons it’s drooling over the “Walking Dead” now. What’s the difference you ask? Why Zombies of course, and advertising, and
Walking Dead is HUGE right now! Dinosaurs are so last century.
Also, a lot of games I play are classic or retro games. And some of the games released this last year
were retro games with HD upgrades to the graphics. How did these hold up? Are they still fun to play? Hell, I still
dust “Zone of Enders” and a few others off from time to time for the sole reason of them being damn
good, and damn fun games. Did they fix
any of the control issues? Come on
journalists! Be motha fuckin’ journalists! Tons of retro games were re released and not a
one snuck onto the list…but…Mists of motha fuckin’ Pandaria did.
So here’s too you Game Informer; and your list of polished turds,
oatmeal, and the odd raisin.
*sigh*
/end rant
*sigh*
/end rant